The analysis "The Style industry: free to exist an private," written past Hannah Berry analyzed two unlike shoe brands. Examining ads for Clarks and Sorel, Berry states that both ads "break free from the standard beauty mold and be ourselves (95)."  The Clarks advertizement promotes "ring geek chic" as Berry refers to it, claiming the girl is doing what she loves. As for the other past Sorel it gives off the since of boldness. Both of the ads bear witness unlike means of way and that beauty isn't but on the outside.

When reading this analysis of the ads, I agreed with Berry that the ads give a different outlook on dazzler. Simply I don't concur with Drupe saying the girl is doing what she loves in the Clarks advert. My thesis is Berry assumed that the girl in the Clarks advertizement was doing what she loved, and that the girl in the Sorel advertising had a bold sense of self wearing the shoes. My indicate is Berry makes all these claims without doing research, I feel like she states these claims based off the look of the ads.

My textual evidence is when Berry's talking about the Clarks advertizing, Berry states "photographed in standing contour, this quirky-looking immature adult female is doing what she loves-playing some kind of trumpet (95)." If Berry would accept done more research she would have of been able to tell what kind of trumpet information technology was and if the girl fifty-fifty played the instrument, instead of merely belongings it for a photoshoot. While Berry talks well-nigh the Sorel ad she states "The advertisement dares us to suspension free from the mold of social club and do something fearless (97)."  The Sorel ad equally Drupe describes "shows united states a dark haired, red-lipped woman sitting in a formal French upholstered chair in a dark-blue, elaborately paneled parlor. An expression of triumph and mischief adorns her sultry visage (97)."  The photo challenges the way you see beauty, but is the girl really bold or is she just putting on a front end for the photoshoot. Berry also states " her white wearing apparel represents a sort of purity an innocence that is completely contradicted past the way she wears it-and by the boots (97)."

I feel the whole point of the Sorel ad is to requite off a sense of being daring and to challenge the way people look at beauty, but when I look at the photo the innocence she talks near seeing I don't see it.  But I do concord with Berry maxim the ads focus "on the beauty of inner power, not just the power of outer beauty, this Sorel ad punctuates its assuming visual argument with a unmarried verbal phrase: "Apres anything" (99)."  My whole point by stating these sentences by Berry is it shows she just based information technology off the looks of the photos and didn't do whatsoever research on the models and see if the one girl really does play the trumpet or if the daughter in the Sorel ad is really assuming.

kitty

Published